Echoes, Whispers, and Memories explores quantum entropy not only as a scientific principle but as an affective engine for aesthetic practice. Across international presentations — Los Angeles, Hangzhou, Linz, Singapore, and Milan — the project renders instability, collapse, and recomposition perceptible at architectural scale. Entropy here is not abstract disorder but lived condition: wildfire haze in Southern California, immigration enforcement pressures on precarious labor, the monumental dispersal of imagery across Hangzhou’s skyline, the full-field immersion of Deep Space 8K, and the reflective contradictions of Singapore’s educational and luxury contexts.
The framework centers a triad: echoes (crises that return altered through architectures and communities), whispers (fragile yet urgent transmissions demanding attentive listening), and memories (collective imprints that bind local sites to planetary scales). The aim is to reposition media architecture from decorative spectacle to a site for sensing instability, amplifying the fragile, and remembering what dominant narratives erase.
Situated within decolonial aesthetics, the project resists abstraction and grounds image, sound, and environment in material histories of displacement, ecological breakdown, and systemic inequality. For the Media Architecture Biennale, it proposes media architecture as an entropic ecology where physics, politics, and affect converge to enable collective reflection.
Keywords: Entropy aesthetics; Media architecture; Decolonial aesthetics; Collective memory; Echoes and whispers
Introduction
The proliferation of urban screens and immersive environments has reconfigured public space into the media city. Too often, façades trend toward spectacle aligned with commercial display. Echoes, Whispers, and Memories counters this by treating media architecture as an entropic architecture of affect — registering instability, amplifying fragile transmissions, and sustaining memory.
Premiering on a 170 × 19 m LED façade in Hangzhou, the project has since been presented at the Los Angeles Center for Digital Art (LACDA), Avenue 50 Studio, Ars Electronica’s Deep Space 8K, Media Art Nexus (NTU), Ten Square (Singapore), and MEET Digital (Milan). Each site refracts the work differently, yielding a constellation of entropic iterations rather than a fixed artifact.
Conceptual Framework
Quantum entropy is approached not as a metric but as an affective engine that generates transformation. In physics, entropy marks irreversibility; translated into aesthetics, it names conditions of instability, loss, and renewal. Signals fragment, architectures collapse, recognition dissolves into flux — and new forms appear. The project mobilizes entropy as method, so instability is felt as sensation rather than abstracted into numbers.
The triad echoes–whispers–memories clarifies this register. Echoes are returns altered by distance and surface — environmental disaster and displacement resounding through architecture. Whispers are fragile transmissions moving through precarious contexts, requiring attention to be perceived. Memories bind both into durations that exceed sites and events, persisting as collective imprints across architectures and communities.
Case Studies
Los Angeles — Fires, Detentions, and the Fragile Architecture of Memory
At LACDA, the exhibition coincided with severe wildfires: digital screens became porous to atmospheric conditions, registering the echoes of ecological catastrophe in breath and visibility. At Avenue 50 Studio, the installation unfolded amid reported immigration enforcement sweeps affecting day laborers. Here, projections functioned less as spectacle than mnemonic transmission — the whispers of community trauma and resilience within a Chicano/Mexican American neighborhood.
Hangzhou — Monumentality and the Fragment
On a 170 × 19 m LED façade, perception becomes shard-like: viewers encounter gem-like fragments refracted across the skyline. The city acts as an echo chamber, magnifying and fracturing perception; memory lingers as afterimages rather than coherent tableaux.
Ars Electronica — Immersion, Recomposition, and Entropic Surfaces
At Deep Space 8K, wall and floor screens with surround sound produce a full-field environment. The wall composition resonates with impressions from Los Angeles; the floor employs turbulent noise fields (e.g., NVIDIA Flow), letting imagery emerge and dissolve. Prompt-driven recursion — graffiti to digital ash, sodium vapor halos, post-industrial debris with Mesoamerican glyphs — operates as entropic seed, yielding a surrealist techno-glitch Junk Dada field underfoot.
Singapore — Contemplation, Contrast, and Urban Display
At Media Art Nexus (15 × 2 m with audio), the horizontal span and sound system invite slow attention; at Ten Square, projections encircle a luxury car tower, juxtaposing entropy with conspicuous display. Reflection at MAN; irony at Ten Square — two readings of the same vocabulary within a city of ordered surfaces.
Discussion
Taken together, these contexts show how Echoes, Whispers, and Memories turn media architecture into an entropic architecture of affect. The result is not a fixed work but an entropic iteration — instability as method and meaning.
Media façades and immersive environments are not neutral surfaces; they are living archives of social and ecological forces. Screens echo past crises, transmit whispers of ongoing struggle, and bind memories into shared perception. Grounding entropy in specific sites — fires and detentions in Los Angeles, monumental fracture in Hangzhou, immersion in Linz, contemplation and consumption in Singapore — resists ornamental abstraction and insists on situated reading.
Conclusion: Toward an Entropic Media Architecture
Echoes, Whispers, and Memories proposes media architecture as an entropic ecology where physics, politics, and affect converge. The echoes of crisis never return unchanged; whispers demand attention to fragile transmissions; memories bind traces into a durable, situated understanding.
This cartography — moving between monumental and intimate, immersive and fragmentary, reflective and spectacular — positions media architecture as an active register of social, ecological, and political forces. Beyond decorative infrastructure, it becomes a platform for registering instability, amplifying the fragile, and sustaining memory.
References
Berry, C., Harbord, J., & Moore, R. (Eds.). (2013). Public space, media space. Palgrave Macmillan.
Connerton, P. (1989). How societies remember. Cambridge University Press.
Ernst, W. (2013). Digital memory and the archive. University of Minnesota Press.
Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press.
Grosz, E. (2008). Chaos, territory, art: Deleuze and the framing of the Earth. Columbia University Press.
Latour, B., & Weibel, P. (Eds.). (2020). Critical Zones: The Science and Politics of Landing on Earth. MIT Press.
Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Duke University Press.
McQuire, S. (2008). The media city: Media, architecture and urban space. SAGE.
McQuire, S., Martin, M., & Niederer, S. (Eds.). (2009). Urban Screens Reader. Institute of Network Cultures.
Mignolo, W. D. (2011). The darker side of Western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Duke University Press.
Pop, S., Stalder, U., Struppek, M., & Tscherteu, G. (Eds.). (2012). Urban media cultures. avedition.
Pop, S., Toft (Ag), T. R., Calvillo, N., & Wright, M. (Eds.). (2016). What urban media art can do: Why, when, where & how. avedition.
Smith, L. T. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Struppek, M. (2006). Urban Screens — The urbane potential of public screens for interaction. Intelligent Agent, 6(2).
Zielinski, S. (2006). Deep time of the media: Toward an archaeology of hearing and seeing by technical means. MIT Press.
